Science Learning Outcomes of Junior High School Students on The Topic of Global Warming : A Descriptive Study with Rasch-Logit Item Analysis
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the science learning outcomes of Grade IX junior secondary students on the topic of global warming in North Luwu Regency through descriptive statistics and Rasch-logit item analysis. A quantitative descriptive design was employed involving 378 students from four public junior secondary schools (SMPN 1 Sabbang, SMPN 1 Masamba, SMPN 3 Sabbang Selatan, and SMPN 4 Masamba). The instrument consisted of 20 multiple-choice items aligned with cognitive levels C1–C4 of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2015). Recalculation showed 5,583 correct responses, with an overall mean score of 14.77 out of 20, confirming the reported thesis mean of 14.76. Students’ achievement was categorised as high (Arikunto, 2018). SMPN 3 Sabbang Selatan obtained the highest mean score (17.20; very high category), whereas SMPN 1 Sabbang obtained the lowest mean score (13.85; high category). The KR-20 coefficient was 0.674, indicating moderate internal consistency. Item difficulty analysis showed that 13 items were easy, 7 items were moderate, and no item was difficult. The most difficult item was Item 18 (p = 0.415; logit = +0.342), while the easiest was Item 11 (p = 0.902; logit = −2.221). Wright Map visualisation indicates that the instrument needs more challenging items, particularly at C2–C4 levels (Bond & Fox, 2015; Boone et al., 2014).
References
Annisa, L. W., & Habibi, A. A. (2020). Hubungan keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan hasil belajar peserta didik. Edubiologica, 8(1), 35–37. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/edubiologica/article/view/2337
Arif, R. N. H., Arif, R. M., & Samputri, S. (2024). Description ability literacy science numeracy in Class VIII students at SMP IT Wahdah Islamiyah Makassar. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 338–343. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2601
Arif, R. N. H., Samputri, S., & Yanto, N. (2023). Differences in student motivation by using Quizizz media and printed books in Class VIII SMPN 27 Makassar. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(5), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2193
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Ed. revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Azizah, N., Suseno, M., & Hayat, B. (2021). Item analysis of the Rasch model items in the final semester exam Indonesian language lesson. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p15
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Ernawati, E., Manik, F. Y., Trisnawati, R. D., Emiliana, E., & Yuliawati, S. (2022). Understanding and quality of minimum competency assessment (AKM) questions made by integrated science teachers in junior high schools. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i2.48670
Haw, L. H., Sharif, S. B., & Han, C. G. K. (2022). Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(4), 1714–1724. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22304
Hifjir, M., & Agustizar, M. (2020). Tingkat pengetahuan lingkungan hidup dengan sikap peduli lingkungan hidup pada siswa SMP Negeri se-Kluet Raya. GeoRafflesia: Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 5(2), 65–74.
Irmayanti, R., Rusdi, M., & Yusnaidar. (2023). The Rasch model: Implementation of physics learning evaluation instrument based on higher order thinking skills. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.325
Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., Purwanti, S., & Fitrianawati, M. (2021). HOTs multiple choice and essay questions: A validated instrument to measure higher-order thinking skills of prospective teachers. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.97
Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan, 21(1), 45–56. https://jurnal.uny.ac.id/index.php/humanika/article/view/29252
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
Olsen, A. A., Mostacedo-Marasovic, S. J., & Forbes, C. T. (2023). Applying Rasch modeling to a global climate change concept knowledge assessment for secondary students. In X. Liu & W. J. Boone (Eds.), Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education (pp. 169–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28776-3_8
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Prabawati, L. (2021). Analisis kepekaan lingkungan siswa SMP pada pembelajaran IPA topik pemanasan global. IMPROVEMENT: Jurnal Ilmiah untuk Peningkatan Mutu Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 36–46.
Purnomo, A. B., Sudibyo, E., Budiyanto, M., Sari, D. A. P., & Sabtiawan, W. B. (2021). Scientific literacy of COVID-19 in the first year pandemic: Design and development test. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v7n1.p48-55
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5E learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956
Samputri, S., Ramlawati, Arif, R. N. H., Arif, R. M., & Muhiddin, S. M. A. (2024). Design alat peraga IPA dan kebermanfaatannya berdasarkan hasil workshop terhadap alumni mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan IPA. Vokatek: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.61255/vokatekjpm.v2i2.376
Siregar, H. T. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar dalam pembelajaran PAI. Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan (JITK), 2(2), 215–226. https://ejournal.edutechjaya.com/index.php/jitk/article/view/791
Soeharto, S., & Cspó, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7(11), e08352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352
Sufinasa, S. A., Hasanuddin, H., Saenab, S., Arif, R. N. H., Samputri, S., & Hasan, N. R. (2023). Description of science process skills of Class VIII students of SMPN in Makassar City. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 10(2), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v10i2.3891
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Umar, R. A., Husain, R. I., & Arif, R. M. (2024). Penerapan model pembelajaran TGT berbantuan media question card untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran IPA di kelas IV SDN No. 17 Dungingi. Eduproxima: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.29100/.v6i4.5367
Wildan, W., Hakim, A., & Supriadi, N. (2020). Pengetahuan, sikap, dan perilaku remaja di Pulau Lombok terhadap isu pemanasan global. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 84–90. https://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/319
Copyright (c) 2026 Rifda Nur Hikmawati Arif, Aulia Aura Yusmaputri, Hasanuddin Hasanuddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




