Demonstrasi dan Drill bagi Peserta Didik dengan Hambatan Intelektual

  • Yulinda Y. Gani Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Meiske Puluhulawa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Nicki Yutapratama Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Susanti Iman Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Keywords: metode demonstrasi, drill, hambatan intelektual, pembelajaran adaptif, SLB

Abstract

Peserta didik dengan hambatan intelektual memerlukan pembelajaran yang konkret, bertahap, dan berulang agar materi dapat diakses sesuai kemampuan adaptifnya. Studi ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penerapan metode demonstrasi dan drill, respons peserta didik, serta faktor pendukung dan penghambat pembelajaran pada jenjang SDLB, SMPLB, dan SMALB di salah satu SLB Kabupaten Gorontalo. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan desain studi kasus. Data bersumber dari observasi pembelajaran, wawancara guru atau pendamping, dan dokumentasi terhadap tujuh peserta didik serta pendidik yang terlibat. Data dianalisis melalui kondensasi, penyajian, dan penarikan simpulan, disertai triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa demonstrasi dilaksanakan melalui pemodelan langsung, gambar profesi, alat hitung konkret, praktik membaca Iqro, dan penggunaan komputer. Drill diterapkan melalui pengulangan instruksi singkat, latihan berhitung, membaca, mengingat konsep, dan mengetik secara bertahap. Peserta didik memperlihatkan respons berupa perhatian yang lebih terarah, keberanian menjawab, penyelesaian tugas, dan kebanggaan terhadap hasil kerja. Pelaksanaan pembelajaran didukung media konkret, pendekatan individual, penguatan positif, dan penataan kelas yang aksesibel, tetapi dibatasi oleh rentang perhatian pendek, kejenuhan, variasi emosi, hambatan motorik, dan dukungan keluarga yang belum merata. Kombinasi demonstrasi dan drill mendukung pembelajaran adaptif apabila disertai diferensiasi tugas dan bantuan yang dikurangi secara bertahap.

Kata Kunci: metode demonstrasi, drill, hambatan intelektual, pembelajaran adaptif, SLB

Abstract

Students with intellectual disabilities require concrete, gradual, and repeated instruction so that learning materials are accessible to their adaptive abilities. This study described the implementation of demonstration and drill methods, students’ responses, and supporting and inhibiting factors across primary, junior secondary, and senior secondary levels at a special school in Gorontalo Regency. A descriptive qualitative case-study design was employed. Data were obtained through classroom observations, interviews with teachers or assistants, and documentation involving seven students and the educators who supported them. Data were analyzed through condensation, display, and conclusion drawing, supported by source and technique triangulation. Demonstration was implemented through direct modeling, occupation pictures, concrete counting tools, Iqro reading practice, and computer use. Drill was applied through repeated short instructions and gradual practice in counting, reading, recalling concepts, and typing. Students showed more focused attention, willingness to answer, task completion, and pride in their work. Instruction was supported by concrete media, individualized assistance, positive reinforcement, and accessible classroom arrangements, while short attention spans, boredom, emotional variability, motor difficulties, and uneven family support remained barriers. The combination of demonstration and drill supports adaptive instruction when accompanied by differentiated tasks and gradually faded assistance.

Keywords: demonstration method, drill, intellectual disability, adaptive learning, special school

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Beqiraj, L., Denne, L. D., Hastings, R. P., & Paris, A. (2022). Positive behavioural support for children and young people with developmental disabilities in special education settings: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(3), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12989

Berk, L. E. (2017). Development through the lifespan (7th ed.). Pearson.

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2019). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (14th ed.). Pearson.

Hofmann, V., & Müller, C. M. (2022). Challenging behaviour in students with intellectual disabilities: The role of individual and classmates’ communication skills. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 66(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12922

Hasan, M. A., Alhasni, J., Gobel, R., Arwildayanto, Lakadjo, M. A., Siregar, I. K., & Tuasikal, J. M. S. (2025). Inclusive-Counsel: Website-Based Inclusive Guidance and Counseling Service Design for Students with Special Needs. Jurnal Ilmiah Bimbingan Konseling Undiksha, 16(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.23887/jibk.v16i2.102395

Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Badar, J. (2023). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (15th ed.). Pearson.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M. J. (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports (12th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Sermier Dessemontet, R., Linder, A.-L., Martinet, C., & Martini-Willemin, B.-M. (2022). A descriptive study on reading instruction provided to students with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(3), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211016170

Strnadová, I., Danker, J., Dowse, L., & Tso, M. (2024). Supporting students with disability to improve academic, social and emotional, and self-determination and life-skills outcomes: Umbrella review of evidence-based practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(14), 3606–3622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2221239

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2020). Landasan psikologi proses pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO.

Uno, H. B. (2021). Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya: Analisis di bidang pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

World Health Organization. (2023). Disability. https://www.who.int/health-topics/disability

Woolfolk, A. (2019). Educational psychology (14th ed.). Pearson.

Rho, M. J., Lee, H., Lee, T. H., Cho, H., Jung, D. J., Kim, D. J., & Choi, I. Y. (2018). Risk factors for internet gaming disorder: Psychological factors and gaming characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 40.

Schneider, L. A., King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2017). Family factors in adolescent problematic internet gaming: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(3), 321–333.

Stevens, M. W. R., Dorstyn, D., Delfabbro, P. H., & King, D. L. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568.

World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th revision). Geneva: WHO

Published
2026-05-31
How to Cite
Gani, Y. Y., Puluhulawa, M., Yutapratama, N., & Iman, S. (2026). Demonstrasi dan Drill bagi Peserta Didik dengan Hambatan Intelektual. JAMBURA Guidance and Counseling Journal, 7(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.37411/jgcj.v7i1.4866